To authorize the Secretary of Education to award grants to create evidence-based student success programs designed to increase participation, retention, and completion rates of high-need students.
Introduced June 11, 2026 · Last action June 11, 2026
Plain English Summary
This bill authorizes the Secretary of Education to award grants to schools and educational institutions that develop and implement evidence-based programs aimed at helping high-need students participate more, stay enrolled longer, and complete their degrees or credentials. The bill creates a new federal grant program but does not specify funding amounts, dollar thresholds, or which schools would qualify.
Who benefits
Public and private colleges, universities, community colleges, and K-12 school districts that receive federal grants; high-need students (lower-income students, first-generation college students, students from underrepresented minorities, and other underserved populations); education program developers and consultants who design evidence-based interventions; non-profit organizations specializing in student support services.
Who pays / loses
Federal taxpayers fund the grant program through general appropriations; schools that do not receive grants do not directly benefit; schools without capacity to develop evidence-based programs may face competitive disadvantage in accessing federal resources.
Funding & Lobbying Interests
Education foundations and non-profit organizations focused on college access and completion (such as those backing legislation improving student outcomes) typically advocate for such programs. For-profit education companies and student success technology vendors (course management systems, predictive analytics platforms, tutoring services) have financial interest in schools adopting their evidence-based solutions. Publishers and assessment companies benefit if grants support their products. No sponsor finance data was provided for this bill.
Political Impact
Affected Groups
High-need students, particularly low-income students, first-generation college students, students from underrepresented racial and ethnic backgrounds, and adult learners seeking credential completion. Rural and under-resourced school districts and colleges may have lower capacity to compete for competitive grants. Community colleges serving predominantly disadvantaged populations could benefit significantly if they successfully compete for funding.
Political Subtext
Proponents argue this targets a genuine equity problem: high-need students have lower completion rates, and evidence-based interventions (mentoring, financial aid coaching, accelerated remediation) demonstrably improve outcomes. Critics may question whether competitive grants (rather than formula-based funding) effectively reach the most disadvantaged schools, and whether the bill lacks specificity on funding levels, eligibility, or accountability measures. Non-partisan research (National Center for Education Statistics, ACE research) shows completion gaps between low-income and higher-income students are substantial, and targeted interventions do improve retention and completion. The bill does not specify budget authority or appropriations, leaving the actual impact dependent on future Congressional action.
Real-World Stakes
If enacted and appropriated, grants would fund programs such as intrusive advising, first-year seminars, emergency financial aid, course redesign, and peer mentoring—all documented in research as effective at improving retention and completion for disadvantaged students. States and institutions with similar programs (Georgia's PELL program, CUNY's ASAP program, community college completion initiatives) have shown 5–15 percentage point increases in completion rates for participating students. However, without specified appropriations and clear eligibility criteria, the bill's actual impact depends entirely on future funding decisions and how the Secretary chooses to award grants. Schools unable to compete effectively for grants (small, rural, under-resourced institutions) may fall further behind.
Sponsor
Sponsor information not available.
Vote Record
No recorded votes.
Campaign Finance — Primary Sponsor
No campaign finance data available yet.
501(c)(4) disclosure: Contributions from 501(c)(4) "dark money" organizations are not required to be publicly disclosed and are not reflected in the figures above. Data sourced from FEC public disclosure filings.
Community Discussion
Share this bill
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first.