Parent PLUS Loan Fairness and Responsibility Act of 2026
Introduced June 11, 2026 · Last action June 11, 2026
Plain English Summary
This bill amends the Higher Education Act of 1965 to allow certain Federal student loans to be transferred from a parent borrower to a child borrower. Currently, federal student loans are non-transferable; this bill would create a mechanism for parents who have borrowed federal loans (typically Parent PLUS loans) to shift that debt obligation to their adult children.
Who benefits
Adult children who are able to assume parent federal loans at rates that may be more favorable than private loans they could otherwise obtain; parents seeking to exit loan repayment obligations by transferring debt to adult children with stronger financial positions; student loan servicers who gain additional loan accounts and fee revenue from processing transfers and managing the new loan relationships.
Who pays / loses
Parents who transfer loans lose the ability to claim Parent PLUS loan tax deductions and federal income-driven repayment protections for transferred amounts; adult children who accept transferred loans become liable for repayment on terms and interest rates set by federal loan programs; the federal government may experience changes in default rates and repayment patterns if transfers shift debt to borrowers with different financial profiles; borrowers who do not have family members able or willing to transfer debt to them face no new options and may see relative disadvantage in loan availability.
Funding & Lobbying Interests
Student loan servicing companies (Navient, Nelnet, Mohela, Great Lakes) benefit from expanded loan portfolio management and servicing fee revenue; private student loan companies may lobby against the provision if federal loan transfers reduce demand for private refinancing products; consumer advocacy organizations focused on student debt reduction may support the bill as an alternative to strict forgiveness programs; education finance industry groups have general interest in loan program modifications that affect their business models.
Political Impact
Affected Groups
Approximately 7.6 million Parent PLUS loan borrowers (the only federal loan product primarily taken by parents rather than students); their adult children aged 22-65 who may assume transferred loans; households with multiple college-educated adult children where debt consolidation across family members may be strategically beneficial; lower-to-middle income families where parent borrowers carry high debt burdens and seek exit strategies.
Political Subtext
Proponents argue this bill provides flexibility for families burdened by parent student loan debt and creates an alternative to broad loan forgiveness by allowing voluntary, family-based debt management. Critics may contend the bill does nothing to address underlying cost of higher education, may incentivize families to shift debt to less financially stable adult children, and represents a band-aid solution that benefits servicers more than borrowers. Non-partisan analysis would examine whether transfers actually reduce financial hardship or merely relocate it within families without reducing total debt burden.
Real-World Stakes
If this passes, parents with Parent PLUS loans gain a legal mechanism to exit repayment by transferring debt to adult children—a shift that could meaningfully change family finances but may also create intergenerational financial risk if adult children default. Analogous state-level loan assumption programs (e.g., some state savings plans allowing beneficiary changes) show mixed outcomes: they provide flexibility but can create disputes over repayment responsibility if family circumstances change. No major federal precedent exists for federal loan transfers between family members, making this a novel policy with uncertain long-term consequences for default rates, servicer profitability, and family financial dynamics. The absence of a fiscal note in the bill text means no CBO cost estimate is currently available to assess budgetary impact.
Sponsor
Co-sponsors (3)
DRep. García, Jesús G. "Chuy" [D-IL-4]DRep. Krishnamoorthi, Raja [D-IL-8]DDel. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]
Vote Record
No recorded votes.
Campaign Finance — Primary Sponsor
Top contributing industries
Other$212,482
Finance$14,100
Defense$6,600
Energy$6,300
Healthcare$3,300
501(c)(4) disclosure: Contributions from 501(c)(4) "dark money" organizations are not required to be publicly disclosed and are not reflected in the figures above. Data sourced from FEC public disclosure filings.
Community Discussion
Share this bill
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first.