Closing the HPV Testing Gap Act
Introduced May 20, 2026 · Last action May 20, 2026
Plain English Summary
This bill directs the National Institutes of Health to study how to develop a standardized, noninvasive test for human papillomavirus (HPV) in men within 24 months and report findings within 30 months. Currently, there is no FDA-approved HPV diagnostic test for men, even though men can contract and transmit HPV and develop HPV-related cancers like oropharyngeal cancer. The bill funds this study using existing NIH appropriations for fiscal years 2026 through 2030.
Who benefits
Men who may benefit from earlier HPV detection and cancer prevention; women whose cervical cancer risk may be reduced through male partner HPV detection and treatment; clinical diagnostic companies and in vitro diagnostic manufacturers that develop and commercialize HPV tests for men; public health agencies that gain population-level HPV surveillance capability; research institutions and academic medical centers that participate in pilot and feasibility studies; high-risk and underserved communities that would receive equitable access to testing protocols.
Who pays / loses
U.S. taxpayers who fund NIH appropriations for fiscal years 2026-2030; healthcare systems that would need to implement new testing protocols and screening infrastructure; insurance companies that would potentially cover new HPV tests for men if approved and recommended.
Funding & Lobbying Interests
In vitro diagnostic manufacturers and clinical laboratory companies stand to benefit financially from the development and commercialization of new HPV tests for men. Public health advocacy organizations focused on cancer prevention and sexually transmitted infection control support this legislation. The bill itself does not specify a budget allocation beyond directing use of existing NIH appropriations. No sponsor campaign finance data was provided.
Political Impact
Affected Groups
Men of all ages (estimated to comprise approximately 160 million individuals in the U.S. adult population) who could benefit from HPV screening and early cancer detection; women of reproductive age (estimated 40 million in the U.S.) whose cervical cancer risk may be indirectly reduced; healthcare workers and clinicians who would implement new testing protocols; underserved and high-risk populations explicitly identified in the bill as focal points for pilot studies; oropharyngeal cancer patients (approximately 48,000 cases annually in the U.S., with HPV responsible for approximately 70% of cases, disproportionately affecting men).
Political Subtext
Proponents frame this as addressing a significant public health equity gap: men currently have no FDA-approved HPV diagnostic test despite being susceptible to HPV infection and related cancers, while HPV testing has been standard for women's cervical cancer screening for decades. They argue that male HPV detection protects women's health by reducing transmission pathways. The bill cites the National Academies of Sciences 2023 report endorsing system-wide cancer prevention strategies. Critics do not appear to have registered substantive opposition in the bill's legislative record, though some may question whether resources are better directed toward vaccination expansion (where the HPV vaccine is already proven effective in both sexes) rather than diagnostic test development for men, given that HPV vaccination rates remain suboptimal among both adolescent boys and girls in the U.S. Non-partisan cancer prevention literature supports HPV testing as clinically valuable, but evidence on optimal screening protocols for men remains limited compared to the decades of cervical cancer screening research.
Real-World Stakes
If this bill passes, the NIH will spend 24-30 months developing recommendations for a male HPV test—a test that currently does not exist in FDA-approved form. This could lead to regulatory submissions to the FDA and eventual commercialization of new diagnostic tests. Analogous precedent: the HPV vaccine (Gardasil), approved for men in 2009, was subsequently recommended by the CDC for routine male adolescent vaccination starting in 2011, expanding the vaccine market and reducing HPV transmission across both sexes over time. However, vaccination uptake has remained suboptimal (approximately 75% of adolescent girls and 64% of adolescent boys as of 2022), suggesting that availability does not automatically translate to population uptake. Male HPV screening at scale would require parallel infrastructure changes (training of providers, patient awareness, integration into screening protocols), analogous to the rollout of cervical HPV testing that began replacing Pap smears in the 2000s. The bill's explicit focus on equitable access and underserved communities suggests potential for reducing disparities in cancer outcomes, though implementation success depends on resources allocated at state and local levels post-study.
Sponsor
Co-sponsors (20)
DRep. Figures, Shomari [D-AL-2]DRep. Beatty, Joyce [D-OH-3]DRep. Simon, Lateefah [D-CA-12]DRep. Underwood, Lauren [D-IL-14]DRep. Green, Al [D-TX-9]DRep. Waters, Maxine [D-CA-43]DRep. Veasey, Marc A. [D-TX-33]DRep. Watson Coleman, Bonnie [D-NJ-12]DRep. Velázquez, Nydia M. [D-NY-7]DRep. Kennedy, Timothy M. [D-NY-26]DRep. Thompson, Bennie G. [D-MS-2]DRep. Clarke, Yvette D. [D-NY-9]DRep. Carter, Troy A. [D-LA-2]DRep. Williams, Nikema [D-GA-5]DDel. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]DRep. Johnson, Henry C. "Hank" [D-GA-4]DRep. Bynum, Janelle [D-OR-5]DRep. Bell, Wesley [D-MO-1]DRep. Menendez, Robert [D-NJ-8]DRep. Davis, Danny K. [D-IL-7]
Vote Record
No recorded votes.
Campaign Finance — Primary Sponsor
Top contributing industries
Other$123,342.78
Finance$9,480
Technology$3,000
Transportation$2,750
Law$2,000
501(c)(4) disclosure: Contributions from 501(c)(4) "dark money" organizations are not required to be publicly disclosed and are not reflected in the figures above. Data sourced from FEC public disclosure filings.
Community Discussion
Share this bill
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first.