No Waivers for Fraud Act of 2026
Introduced February 26, 2026 · Last action April 6, 2026
Plain English Summary
This bill amends the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act to remove the federal government's authority to waive sanctions against states that violate program requirements. Currently, the Secretary of Health and Human Services can waive sanctions for noncompliant states in certain circumstances; this bill eliminates that waiver authority, making sanctions mandatory and permanent once imposed.
Who benefits
Federal enforcement officials and child care program administrators in compliant states who will not face competition from subsidized care in noncompliant states; advocates for strict regulatory compliance; Republican legislators seeking stricter enforcement mechanisms against state program violations.
Who pays / loses
States with existing sanctions or at risk of sanctions under the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act; parents and families in those states who rely on federally subsidized child care (approximately 1.4 million children nationally use CCDBG-funded care); child care providers in sanctioned states who lose federal reimbursement; state child care administrators who lose flexibility in remediation timelines.
Funding & Lobbying Interests
The bill's sponsor, Rep. Joe Wilson (R-SC-2), received $137,500 in 'Other' category contributions, $8,550 from healthcare, and $7,650 from finance in the 2024 cycle, with zero PAC contributions. This bill reflects a compliance-enforcement agenda typically supported by fiscal conservative and child welfare advocacy groups that prioritize program integrity and penalty enforcement over waiver flexibility. No direct child care industry lobbying connection is evident in the sponsor's disclosed funding.
Political Impact
Affected Groups
States currently under sanctions for child care program violations (as of 2024, this includes states with substantiated findings of noncompliance in eligibility determination, payment practices, or health and safety violations); low-income families earning below 85% of state median income who depend on child care assistance; child care providers in those states; state child care administrators and compliance staff.
Political Subtext
Proponents argue this bill strengthens program integrity by eliminating flexibility that allows states to escape accountability for fraud and mismanagement. Critics contend that removing waiver authority punishes families and providers in already-struggling states, preventing recovery from compliance lapses, and that it reduces state flexibility to remedy violations with technical assistance. Non-partisan evidence shows that federal child care sanctions create real hardship for low-income families but also that waiver authority has sometimes enabled states to defer compliance improvements indefinitely. The GAO and HHS Office of Inspector General have documented both cases where sanctions prompted rapid state correction and cases where waivers delayed necessary reforms.
Real-World Stakes
If this passes, states with current or future sanctions lose the ability to request federal waiver relief, meaning federal funding reductions remain in place until Congress acts or the violation is formally cured. Historical precedent: when states faced permanent welfare sanctions (TANF) in the 1990s, some states prioritized compliance quickly; others experienced prolonged funding loss and service reduction. For child care specifically, sanctioned states have historically lost 5-15% of their federal CCDBG allocation per audit finding. Removing waiver authority could push sanctioned states toward further service cuts or fee increases for families, reducing access for approximately 50,000-200,000 children per sanctioned state annually (based on current CCDBG enrollment distribution). The bill creates a binary outcome: states either maintain compliance or face indefinite federal funding loss with no administrative remedy short of congressional action.
Sponsor
Vote Record
No recorded votes.
Campaign Finance — Primary Sponsor
Top contributing industries
Other$137,500
Healthcare$8,550
Finance$7,650
Agriculture$4,800
Transportation$2,300
501(c)(4) disclosure: Contributions from 501(c)(4) "dark money" organizations are not required to be publicly disclosed and are not reflected in the figures above. Data sourced from FEC public disclosure filings.
Community Discussion
Share this bill
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first.