Daylight Act of 2026
Introduced February 4, 2026 · Last action February 4, 2026
Plain English Summary
This bill makes daylight saving time permanent year-round by adjusting all U.S. time zones to be 30 minutes ahead of their current standard positions and repealing the requirement to switch between daylight saving and standard time. Instead of "springing forward" and "falling back," the nation would stay on a single, permanently advanced time schedule.
Who benefits
Workers and families who avoid the disruption of changing clocks twice per year; people who prefer more evening daylight for outdoor activities and recreation; industries benefiting from extended daylight hours including retail, entertainment, outdoor recreation, and tourism sectors; parents managing children's schedules; shift workers and healthcare workers who experience fewer circadian disruptions from stable time schedules
Who pays / loses
Children and early risers who would experience darker mornings (particularly in winter months in northern states); agricultural workers who rely on dawn light; industries dependent on morning light such as construction and farming; parents managing school start times in darker conditions; people with seasonal affective disorder triggered by darker mornings
Funding & Lobbying Interests
The bill's sponsor, Mr. Steube (R-FL), represents a state with significant tourism, entertainment, and outdoor recreation industries that benefit from extended evening daylight. No donor finance data was provided. Industries typically supporting permanent daylight time legislation include retail chains, entertainment venues, golf courses, outdoor recreation companies, and tourism boards seeking to extend consumer activity hours and boost discretionary spending.
Political Impact
Affected Groups
All 330+ million Americans; disproportionate impact on residents of northern states (Maine, Montana, Alaska, northern Wisconsin) who would experience significantly darker winter mornings; shift workers and healthcare professionals; school-age children; agricultural workers; parents managing morning school routines
Political Subtext
Proponents argue permanent daylight time reduces health risks from clock-switching (car accidents, heart attacks, strokes during transition periods), aligns with public preference for evening daylight, and boosts economic activity and consumer spending in retail and entertainment sectors. Critics note that darker winter mornings harm circadian rhythms, increase seasonal affective disorder (especially in northern states), create safety hazards for children traveling to school in darkness, and conflict with established scientific consensus favoring permanent standard time (not daylight time) for human health. The American Academy of Sleep Medicine and American Medical Association have opposed permanent daylight time, recommending permanent standard time instead. The bill represents a minority position within the scientific and medical community.
Real-World Stakes
If enacted, the U.S. would join Hawaii, Arizona, and U.S. territories in permanent daylight time (though those jurisdictions use permanent standard time, not advanced time). Florida, Washington, and California have passed state measures seeking similar authority. Evidence from previous permanent daylight time trials (e.g., 1970s energy crisis experiment) showed minimal energy savings and increased accidents due to darker mornings. Studies of the current clock-switching system show 1.5-2% increase in car accidents and 25% spike in heart attacks on the Monday following spring-forward. The 30-minute adjustment (rather than standard 1-hour shift) is unusual and creates potential synchronization problems with international commerce, computer systems, and neighboring time zones.
Sponsor
Sponsor information not available.
Vote Record
No recorded votes.
Campaign Finance — Primary Sponsor
No campaign finance data available yet.
501(c)(4) disclosure: Contributions from 501(c)(4) "dark money" organizations are not required to be publicly disclosed and are not reflected in the figures above. Data sourced from FEC public disclosure filings.
Community Discussion
Share this bill
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first.