Doug LaMalfa Federal Disaster Tax Relief Certainty Act
Introduced September 15, 2025 · Last action September 3, 2026
Plain English Summary
This bill makes permanent and extends two tax relief provisions for disaster victims: (1) it allows individuals in federally declared major disasters (from December 28, 2019 through December 31, 2026) to deduct personal casualty losses without the usual 10% income floor, and (2) it excludes wildfire relief payments from taxable income for individuals receiving compensation for wildfire losses (from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2026). Both provisions are codified into the tax code and apply to tax years beginning after December 31, 2024 (for casualty losses) and after December 31, 2025 (for wildfire payments).
Who benefits
Individuals in federally declared major disaster areas (2019–2026) who suffered personal casualty losses, particularly homeowners and renters in disaster zones. Individuals who received or receive compensation for losses from federally declared wildfire disasters (2015–2026), including homeowners, renters, business owners, and workers who lost wages or incurred living expenses. Homeowners and renters in wildfire-prone areas (California, Oregon, Washington, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, and other western states) who receive settlement payments from state compensation funds, nonprofits, or insurers. Lower and middle-income disaster victims who previously could not deduct losses due to the 10% adjusted gross income limitation.
Who pays / loses
The U.S. Treasury loses foregone tax revenue from the deductions allowed to disaster victims and the exclusion of wildfire relief payments from taxable income. Taxpayers overall bear the indirect cost through reduced federal revenue.
Funding & Lobbying Interests
No specific lobbying group or corporate financial interest is named in the bill text. However, the bill codifies provisions that benefit disaster relief organizations, nonprofits that distribute wildfire recovery funds (such as local Community Foundations and the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services), state disaster compensation programs, and insurance companies that coordinate with federal disaster programs. The bill sponsor name ('Doug LaMalfa Federal Disaster Tax Relief Certainty Act') indicates sponsorship by Representative Doug LaMalfa, a California Republican whose district has been affected by major wildfires. Disaster relief coalitions, state attorneys general offices managing settlement distributions, and homeowners' associations in fire-prone regions typically advocate for such provisions, though no campaign finance data was provided.
Political Impact
Affected Groups
Individuals and families in federally declared major disaster areas from December 28, 2019 through December 31, 2026 — including those affected by hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, and wildfires. Specific populations include homeowners and renters in western states with wildfire declarations (California, Oregon, Washington, Colorado, Idaho, Montana); households earning under $100,000 whose disaster losses previously fell below the 10% adjusted gross income deduction floor; workers who lost wages as a result of disasters; and residents of disaster areas who received government or nonprofit compensation payments.
Political Subtext
Proponents characterize this as necessary relief for disaster victims facing severe financial hardship and argue that codifying and extending these provisions provides certainty for tax planning after repeated temporary extensions. Critics note that the bill extends tax relief to disasters declared as far back as 2015 (for wildfires) and 2019 (for other disasters) without specifying why relief is needed years after events occurred, and that making these provisions permanent could reduce federal revenue without addressing underlying disaster preparedness or climate risk. The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office has not issued a cost estimate for this specific bill, though prior disaster tax relief provisions have been scored as revenue losses. Academic research on disaster relief finds that tax deductions tend to benefit higher-income households more than lower-income households with the same absolute losses, since higher earners face higher marginal tax rates.
Real-World Stakes
If this passes: Disaster victims in covered areas receive permanent tax deductions for casualty losses and tax-free wildfire relief payments, reducing their out-of-pocket burden of recovery. Homeowners in the California Camp Fire (2018), Dixie Fire (2021), and similar recent major disasters, as well as recipients of settlement payments from state wildfire funds, gain tax relief. The federal government foregoes revenue (amount unspecified in the bill). If this does not pass: Disaster victims would revert to standard casualty loss deductions (subject to the 10% adjusted gross income floor) and would owe income tax on wildfire relief payments received. Prior analogous policies: The Taxpayer Certainty and Disaster Tax Relief Act of 2020 (P.L. 116-260) provided temporary disaster casualty loss deductions that this bill makes permanent. California's state-level disaster assistance programs and FEMA's Individual Assistance have been coordinated with federal tax provisions since 2017. No major negative consequences or unintended effects from prior disaster tax relief extensions have been documented in non-partisan assessments, though revenue costs accumulate with each extension.
Sponsor
Co-sponsors (14)
DRep. Vindman, Eugene Simon [D-VA-7]DRep. Panetta, Jimmy [D-CA-19]DRep. Tokuda, Jill N. [D-HI-2]DRep. Thompson, Mike [D-CA-4]RRep. Diaz-Balart, Mario [R-FL-26]RRep. Bilirakis, Gus M. [R-FL-12]DRep. Neguse, Joe [D-CO-2]DRep. Crow, Jason [D-CO-6]DRep. Min, Dave [D-CA-47]RRep. LaMalfa, Doug [R-CA-1]DRep. Moore, Gwen [D-WI-4]RRep. Donalds, Byron [R-FL-19]RRep. Wilson, Joe [R-SC-2]RRep. Bergman, Jack [R-MI-1]
Vote Record
No recorded votes.
Campaign Finance — Primary Sponsor
Top contributing industries
Other$117,910
Healthcare$8,150
Finance$5,900
Law$2,600
Construction$1,250
501(c)(4) disclosure: Contributions from 501(c)(4) "dark money" organizations are not required to be publicly disclosed and are not reflected in the figures above. Data sourced from FEC public disclosure filings.
Community Discussion
Share this bill
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first.