To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the railroad track maintenance credit.
Introduced January 16, 2025 · Last action January 16, 2025
Plain English Summary
This bill increases the federal railroad track maintenance tax credit from $3,500 to $6,100 per mile of track maintained, and indexes it to inflation annually after 2025. It also extends the credit to cover track maintenance expenditures incurred after January 1, 2024, instead of the prior cutoff date of January 1, 2015.
Who benefits
Class II and Class III railroads (regional and shortline railroads, primarily), as they are the primary users of Section 45G tax credits; Amtrak and freight railroads that perform track maintenance qualifying under the credit; railroad infrastructure contractors and suppliers who service these railroads; and potentially passengers and freight shippers who benefit from improved rail infrastructure.
Who pays / loses
The U.S. Treasury and federal taxpayers collectively, who forego tax revenue through increased tax credits claimed by railroads.
Funding & Lobbying Interests
The railroad industry—particularly Class II and Class III regional and shortline railroads, and rail trade associations such as the American Short Line and Regional Railroad Association (ASLRRA)—lobbies for railroad tax credits. Major freight railroads (BNSF, Union Pacific, CSX, Norfolk Southern) and Amtrak also have financial interests in expanded credits. Sponsors Rep. Scott Perry (R-PA) and Rep. Jim Thompson (D-CA) represent districts with railroad infrastructure constituencies; Pennsylvania has significant shortline and regional rail operations, and California contains major rail transportation corridors. No specific donor data was provided in the materials.
Political Impact
Affected Groups
Approximately 600+ Class II and Class III railroads operating in the United States; the four largest freight railroads (which generate substantial earnings and may claim credits for qualifying expenditures); Amtrak (freight and passenger services); railroad employees in track maintenance and repair roles; rail shippers and customers (freight and passenger) who may benefit from improved infrastructure; and federal taxpayers absorbing the revenue cost.
Political Subtext
Proponents argue this bill incentivizes critical railroad infrastructure maintenance, supports rural economies dependent on rail service, and helps smaller regional railroads compete with larger carriers. They cite railroad safety and economic development benefits. Critics contend that the credit primarily benefits profitable large freight railroads and does not require matching revenue offsets, increasing the federal deficit. They question whether the tripled credit generates sufficient incremental maintenance spending or merely subsidizes maintenance railroads would perform anyway. Non-partisan fiscal analysis (CBO estimates, if available) would clarify whether the credit produces dollar-for-dollar infrastructure spending or serves primarily as a corporate tax reduction.
Real-World Stakes
If passed, regional and shortline railroads will receive up to $6,100 per mile annually (indexed to inflation) in tax credits, effectively doubling their financial incentive to maintain track. This reduces federal tax revenue by an estimated amount dependent on total miles claimed across the industry—likely tens of millions to low hundreds of millions annually as the credit matures, absent a CBO estimate. Historical precedent: Section 45G was enacted in 2004 and has operated with the $3,500 credit for two decades; research on its actual infrastructure impact is limited. Similar infrastructure tax credits (e.g., renewable energy credits, work opportunity credits) show mixed evidence on whether they increase qualifying activity beyond baseline levels or primarily reduce taxes on activity that would occur anyway. The 2024 effective date retroactively includes recent expenditures, accelerating credit claims. The inflation adjustment ensures the credit's real value does not erode, but also guarantees rising federal costs unless Congress revisits the provision.
Sponsor
Sponsor information not available.
Vote Record
No recorded votes.
Campaign Finance — Primary Sponsor
No campaign finance data available yet.
501(c)(4) disclosure: Contributions from 501(c)(4) "dark money" organizations are not required to be publicly disclosed and are not reflected in the figures above. Data sourced from FEC public disclosure filings.
Community Discussion
Share this bill
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first.