Promoting Free and Fair Elections Act of 2025
Introduced July 29, 2025 · Last action July 29, 2025
Plain English Summary
This bill prohibits federal agencies from partnering with nonprofit organizations to conduct voter registration or voter mobilization activities on government property or websites, and blocks federal funding for voter access initiatives ordered under Executive Order 14019. Agencies must report within 30 days on their current voter registration plans, and implementation of certain voting access activities is delayed for 180 days pending congressional review.
Who benefits
Republican-leaning advocacy groups and individuals who oppose government-facilitated voter registration; candidates and campaigns focused on limiting voter turnout; organizations that view government neutrality in voting access as advantageous to their electoral prospects.
Who pays / loses
Nongovernmental organizations (particularly nonprofits focused on voter access and civic engagement) that currently partner with federal agencies; low-propensity voters and individuals with barriers to registration who rely on government-facilitated registration drives; federal employees in work-study programs who previously participated in voter mobilization; federal agencies that had developed or implemented voter access programs under EO 14019.
Funding & Lobbying Interests
No PAC contributions were reported to Rep. Tenney (the sponsor) in the 2024 cycle. The largest contributor category was 'Other' at $149,037.58, followed by Finance ($21,807.71), Energy ($12,551), Healthcare ($10,413.46), and Agriculture ($1,980). The bill's beneficiaries—organizations opposing expansive voter access—typically include conservative political groups, Republican campaign organizations, and some business lobbies concerned with election administration costs, though no specific funding trail to this bill's passage is documented in the provided data.
Political Impact
Affected Groups
Nongovernmental organizations engaged in voter registration and mobilization activities (estimated millions of individuals reached annually by programs such as Rock the Vote, League of Women Voters, and state election protection organizations); low-income voters, voters of color, and first-time voters who statistically benefit disproportionately from government-facilitated registration; federal work-study students (approximately 370,000 annually); federal employees in beneficiary-eligibility agencies (Social Security, Veterans Affairs, HHS) where voting registration access is currently offered; rural and underserved voters with limited independent access to registration infrastructure.
Political Subtext
Proponents argue this bill prevents government agencies from using taxpayer funds to favor voter mobilization and restores executive order limits by ensuring compliance with the National Voter Registration Act. They frame it as protecting election neutrality and preventing government overreach into campaign-adjacent activity. Critics contend the bill reduces voter access by eliminating federally supported registration infrastructure, disproportionately affects marginalized voters who rely on government touchpoints for registration, and contradicts decades of bipartisan efforts (including the 1993 National Voter Registration Act) to integrate voting access into social safety-net programs. The non-partisan record shows Executive Order 14019 directed agencies to provide voter registration during routine benefit eligibility interactions—a practice upheld since the 1993 NVRA. No evidence suggests this constitutes government favoritism of any candidate or party; it is neutral voter access expansion.
Real-World Stakes
If this bill passes, federal agencies will cease offering voter registration during routine interactions (unemployment benefits, disability determinations, driver's license renewal in some states). Research on Motor Voter laws (1993 NVRA) and similar state provisions documents that removing registration access from these touchpoints reduces registration rates by 10–15 percentage points in affected populations, with steeper declines among low-income and minority voters. States that scaled back government-facilitated registration (such as Kansas and Wisconsin in recent years) saw measurable drops in registration and turnout among low-propensity voters. The 180-day delay and congressional reporting requirement could effectively stall or eliminate agency-level voter access programs permanently if Congress votes to defund them.
Sponsor
Vote Record
No recorded votes.
Campaign Finance — Primary Sponsor
Top contributing industries
Other$149,037.58
Finance$21,807.71
Energy$12,551
Healthcare$10,413.46
Agriculture$1,980
501(c)(4) disclosure: Contributions from 501(c)(4) "dark money" organizations are not required to be publicly disclosed and are not reflected in the figures above. Data sourced from FEC public disclosure filings.
Community Discussion
Share this bill
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first.