Ensuring Lasting Smiles Act
Introduced May 8, 2025 · Last action May 8, 2025
Plain English Summary
This bill requires all group health plans and individual health insurance to cover diagnosis and treatment of congenital anomalies and birth defects affecting the eyes, ears, teeth, mouth, or jaw, including reconstructive surgery, orthodontic services, and dental work needed to restore normal function or appearance. The requirement applies starting January 1, 2026, and allows plans to impose the same cost-sharing (copays, deductibles, coinsurance) they use for other medical and surgical benefits, but prohibits them from using higher cost-sharing for birth defect treatment.
Who benefits
Children and adults with congenital anomalies or birth defects affecting the eyes, ears, teeth, mouth, or jaw; families previously bearing out-of-pocket costs for orthodontic, dental, prosthodontic, and reconstructive services for these conditions; patients with cleft lip/palate, dental dysplasia, ear malformations, and similar conditions; employers offering health plans (reduced employee medical cost burden); reconstructive surgeons, orthodontists, prosthodontists, and dentists specializing in birth defect treatment (increased patient volume and insurance reimbursement).
Who pays / loses
Health insurance issuers and self-insured employers (increased claims and costs for previously excluded or limited dental, orthodontic, and reconstructive services); employers offering group plans (potential premium increases to fund expanded coverage); workers in plans with tighter margins or smaller risk pools (possible rate increases passed through); individuals in individual market plans (potential premium increases if carriers spread costs across enrollees).
Funding & Lobbying Interests
Organizations advocating for children with birth defects and craniofacial anomalies (American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association, National Craniofacial Association) typically lobby for such mandates. Reconstructive and plastic surgeons, orthodontists, prosthodontists, and pediatric dentists treating these conditions benefit from expanded insurance coverage and patient access. Bill sponsors include bipartisan members; no donor finance data provided in bill text, but dental and surgical professional associations have financial interest in mandate passage due to increased reimbursement volume.
Political Impact
Affected Groups
Approximately 1 in 33 babies born in the U.S. are born with a birth defect (CDC); approximately 1 in 2,500 births involve cleft lip/palate, one of the most common birth defects requiring reconstructive and dental treatment. Families earning less than 400% of federal poverty level (more likely to lack insurance or face high cost-sharing for uncovered services) benefit most. Rural and underinsured populations with limited access to specialists gain coverage but may face network adequacy gaps. Children ages 0–18 with qualifying anomalies and young adults completing treatment gain direct coverage; elderly individuals with congenital anomalies affecting function may also benefit.
Political Subtext
Proponents frame this as a civil rights and health equity measure: children born with treatable structural anomalies should not face lifelong appearance or functional disabilities because families cannot afford reconstruction and dental care. They emphasize that other medical conditions receive coverage for restoration to normal function, and birth defect treatment should be no exception. Critics argue that mandating coverage increases insurance premiums for all enrollees, shifting costs to those without affected family members; some insurers and employer groups contend that dental and orthodontic services have traditionally been optional add-ons precisely because they carry predictable, non-emergency costs that individuals can budget for separately. No non-partisan CBO or GAO cost estimate is available in the bill text. Academic literature on similar state-level birth defect coverage mandates (e.g., cleft palate surgery mandates enacted in the 1990s–2000s) shows small but measurable premium increases offset by long-term medical and social gains, though specific benefit-cost analyses remain limited.
Real-World Stakes
Passage would eliminate current plan-by-plan variation in birth defect coverage and ensure nationwide access to reconstructive, dental, and orthodontic treatment for affected individuals. Patients currently denied or forced to pay out-of-pocket for orthodontics following cleft palate repair, dental implants for congenitally missing teeth, or ear reconstruction would gain insurance coverage. Employer-sponsored plans and individual market plans would incur higher claims costs; the magnitude depends on current denial rates and treatment intensity, which the bill directs HHS to study by 2027. State mandates on similar benefits (e.g., cleft palate surgery mandates in 28+ states by 2015) have been implemented with modest premium impacts (typically 0.1–0.5% increase cited by some actuarial analyses, though estimates vary). The bill's network adequacy study requirement acknowledges potential gaps: specialists performing birth defect reconstruction are geographically concentrated, and expanded coverage could overwhelm existing provider capacity in underserved areas. Implementation risk centers on insurer interpretation of 'medically necessary' determinations and potential litigation over coverage denials.
What's Inside This Bill
Non-obvious provisions not apparent from the headline summary.
Narrow Definition of Covered Congenital Anomalies
The bill only covers birth defects affecting eyes, ears, teeth, mouth, or jaw—excluding congenital anomalies of other body systems (heart, limbs, digestive tract, nervous system, etc.) that may require reconstructive surgery or similar functional restoration.
AffectsChildren and adults born with congenital anomalies outside the specified anatomical regions (e.g., cleft palate patients who also have congenital heart disease) will not receive mandate coverage for non-facial/head defects, creating fragmented coverage for multi-system birth defects.
Cost-Sharing Parity Without Benefit Floor
While the bill prohibits higher cost-sharing for birth defect treatment than other surgical benefits, it allows plans to apply the same cost-sharing as any medical/surgical benefit—meaning plans can impose unlimited copays, deductibles, or coinsurance as long as it matches their standard rates.
AffectsLow-income and uninsured families may face substantial out-of-pocket costs for necessary reconstructive surgery or orthodontic treatment since the mandate only prevents discrimination, not affordability barriers.
Reconstructive vs. Cosmetic Treatment Boundary
The bill covers treatment 'needed to restore normal function or appearance' but does not define the boundary between covered reconstructive surgery and non-covered cosmetic enhancement, creating ambiguity about when procedures exceed functional restoration.
AffectsInsurers will have discretion to deny coverage for procedures they classify as cosmetic rather than reconstructive, potentially leading to inconsistent coverage decisions and appeals for patients with facial/oral birth defects seeking normalization.
No Explicit Coverage Determination Timeline
The bill does not specify timeframes for insurance plan decisions, pre-authorization requirements, or appeal processes for coverage determinations under this mandate.
AffectsPatients awaiting treatment decisions for time-sensitive reconstructive surgery (especially for children) may face indefinite delays while insurers develop coverage guidelines and process requests without regulatory timeframe requirements.
Sponsor
Co-sponsors (195)
DRep. Schrier, Kim [D-WA-8]RRep. Salazar, Maria Elvira [R-FL-27]RRep. Yakym, Rudy [R-IN-2]DDel. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]DRep. Fields, Cleo [D-LA-6]DRep. Quigley, Mike [D-IL-5]DRep. Omar, Ilhan [D-MN-5]DRep. Neguse, Joe [D-CO-2]RRep. Bost, Mike [R-IL-12]DRep. Craig, Angie [D-MN-2]DRep. Kelly, Robin L. [D-IL-2]DRep. Ryan, Patrick [D-NY-18]DRep. DelBene, Suzan K. [D-WA-1]DRep. Olszewski, Johnny [D-MD-2]DRep. Vindman, Eugene Simon [D-VA-7]DRep. McBride, Sarah [D-DE-At Large]RRep. Simpson, Michael K. [R-ID-2]DRep. Castor, Kathy [D-FL-14]RRep. Van Drew, Jefferson [R-NJ-2]DRep. DeLauro, Rosa L. [D-CT-3]+175 more
Vote Record
No recorded votes.
Campaign Finance — Primary Sponsor
Top contributing industries
Other$131,170
Finance$17,286
Law$7,600
Healthcare$4,100
Construction$2,850
501(c)(4) disclosure: Contributions from 501(c)(4) "dark money" organizations are not required to be publicly disclosed and are not reflected in the figures above. Data sourced from FEC public disclosure filings.
Community Discussion
Share this bill
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first.