To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to establish procedures relating to the attribution of errors in the case of third party payors of payroll taxes, and for other purposes.
Introduced May 6, 2025 · Last action May 6, 2025
Plain English Summary
This bill creates new legal protections for third-party payroll tax processors (such as payroll service companies and professional employer organizations) by limiting their liability when employers provide them with incorrect information. Under the new rules, these processors are only liable for errors they knew or should have known about, while employers bear full responsibility for errors the processors didn't catch. The bill also prevents the IRS from delaying payroll tax credits or auditing employers solely because their processor filed an erroneous return.
Who benefits
Payroll service companies, professional employer organizations (PEOs), certified professional employer organizations (CPEOs), payroll processors, and other third-party payroll administrators who handle federal payroll tax compliance for employers. These entities gain reduced legal exposure and liability for errors originating with their employer-clients.
Who pays / loses
Employers bear primary responsibility for payroll tax errors, even when discovered only after a third-party processor files an erroneous return. Employers may face audits, penalties, and interest charges resulting from certifications they provided to processors. The IRS loses some ability to hold processors accountable for obvious errors they process on behalf of clients.
Funding & Lobbying Interests
The bill benefits the payroll processing industry, which includes major companies like ADP, Paychex, Guidepoint, and smaller regional payroll service providers. Professional employer organizations and certified professional employer organizations—growing sectors offering outsourced HR and payroll services—also benefit directly. These industries typically lobby for reduced compliance burden and liability protection. The bill is sponsored by Mr. Thompson of California and Ms. Van Duyne (both parties represented), indicating potential bipartisan business-friendly coalition support, though specific donor data was not provided.
Political Impact
Affected Groups
Small and mid-sized employers who outsource payroll tax processing (estimated millions nationwide based on industry penetration of payroll services); employers using PEOs and CPEOs; payroll processing service providers and their employees; and the IRS enforcement capacity. The bill's protections most directly benefit employers who use third-party processors and those processors themselves, while shifting audit and compliance risk toward employers.
Political Subtext
Proponents argue this bill reduces regulatory burden on payroll processors and small businesses by clarifying liability rules, preventing innocent processors from bearing penalties for employer errors, and streamlining IRS processing of valid tax credits. Critics argue the bill reduces accountability for processors who should catch obvious errors, shifts compliance risk from the service provider (who has expertise and systems to verify) to employers (who rely on those services), and may reduce IRS audit effectiveness by limiting its leverage against sophisticated payroll processors. Non-partisan analysis would note the bill trades processor liability for employer liability without clear evidence either approach reduces overall payroll tax errors or improves compliance; the empirical question of which entity (processor or employer) can more cost-effectively prevent errors is not addressed in the text.
Real-World Stakes
If enacted, employers will become the primary target for IRS penalties and audits arising from payroll tax errors, even when those errors originated with information employers provided to processors but were not caught by processor verification systems. Payroll processors gain legal safety from liability for foreseeable errors. In practice, this may reduce processor incentive to invest in error-detection systems and verification procedures, since employers cannot hold them liable even for errors a reasonable processor should have caught. Employers relying on processors may face significant tax liabilities and audit burdens. The analogous private-sector outcome: liability shifting from service providers to clients typically increases client costs and reduces service quality incentives, as seen in other outsourced compliance fields where service providers face limited liability (e.g., tax preparation services with limited E&O insurance requirements). No CBO analysis, GAO study, or prior federal legislation establishing similar payroll processor liability protections was cited in the bill text.
What's Inside This Bill
Non-obvious provisions not apparent from the headline summary.
IRS Audit Limitation on Processor-Related Errors
The bill prevents the IRS from initiating or continuing audits of employers when the only basis for the audit is an error made by a third-party payroll processor, effectively removing a compliance verification pathway for the agency.
AffectsEmployers using payroll processors could avoid audit scrutiny for payroll tax compliance issues, while the IRS loses enforcement tools to catch systemic processor errors or employer-processor collusion; workers' tax withholding accuracy may not be verified through traditional audit mechanisms.
Processor Liability Standard: 'Knew or Should Have Known'
Processors are only liable for errors they 'knew or should have known about,' which is a subjective standard that shifts burden of proof toward demonstrating processor negligence rather than strict liability for errors in their processing.
AffectsEmployers bear financial responsibility for processor mistakes even when those mistakes involve complex tax code interpretation; small employers without in-house tax expertise are most vulnerable to bearing costs of processor errors.
Payroll Tax Credit Processing Delays Prohibition
The IRS is prohibited from delaying approval or disbursement of payroll tax credits to employers based on processor-filed errors, potentially accelerating credit delivery before error verification is complete.
AffectsEmployers receive tax credits faster regardless of filing accuracy, while the IRS cannot use credit-holding as leverage to verify compliance; if errors are later discovered after credits are disbursed, recovery mechanisms may be limited.
Employer Indemnification for Processor Actions
Employers assume full responsibility for processor errors that the processor didn't know about or should have known about, effectively making the employer the guarantor of processor performance.
AffectsEmployers become liable for compliance failures outside their direct control, shifting risk away from processors; employers may face penalties, back taxes, and interest for processor errors despite having delegated the function to specialists.
Sponsor
Co-sponsors (25)
DRep. Sewell, Terri A. [D-AL-7]RRep. Hern, Kevin [R-OK-1]RRep. Moran, Nathaniel [R-TX-1]RRep. Nunn, Zachary [R-IA-3]DRep. Suozzi, Thomas R. [D-NY-3]RRep. Houchin, Erin [R-IN-9]DRep. Perez, Marie Gluesenkamp [D-WA-3]RRep. Carey, Mike [R-OH-15]RRep. Buchanan, Vern [R-FL-16]RRep. Yakym, Rudy [R-IN-2]DRep. Sánchez, Linda T. [D-CA-38]DRep. Schneider, Bradley Scott [D-IL-10]RRep. Steube, W. Gregory [R-FL-17]DRep. Horsford, Steven [D-NV-4]RRep. Bean, Aaron [R-FL-4]RRep. Kelly, Mike [R-PA-16]DRep. Panetta, Jimmy [D-CA-19]DRep. Davis, Danny K. [D-IL-7]RRep. Miller, Max L. [R-OH-7]DRep. DelBene, Suzan K. [D-WA-1]+5 more
Vote Record
No recorded votes.
Campaign Finance — Primary Sponsor
Top contributing industries
Other$149,079.95
Law$11,000
Energy$5,500
Technology$3,550
Healthcare$3,225
501(c)(4) disclosure: Contributions from 501(c)(4) "dark money" organizations are not required to be publicly disclosed and are not reflected in the figures above. Data sourced from FEC public disclosure filings.
Community Discussion
Share this bill
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first.