Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating to "Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Commercial Water Heating Equipment".
Introduced January 9, 2025 · Last action January 9, 2025
Plain English Summary
This bill would overturn a Department of Energy rule, issued in October 2023, that sets new energy efficiency standards for commercial water heating equipment. If passed, the rule would be nullified and manufacturers could continue selling less efficient commercial water heaters without meeting the new conservation standards.
Who benefits
Commercial water heating equipment manufacturers (primarily Rheem, A.O. Smith, Bradford White, Noritz, and other domestic and international HVAC/water heating suppliers) who would avoid compliance costs and design modifications required by the new efficiency standards. Building owners and contractors who currently use less expensive, lower-efficiency commercial water heaters would face no requirement to upgrade.
Who pays / loses
Building owners and facility operators who would lose access to more efficient water heating equipment options and would continue paying higher energy costs for commercial water heating systems. Utility companies and grid operators lose demand-side energy conservation benefits. Natural gas and electricity consumers indirectly bear higher energy costs system-wide when commercial sector efficiency gains are forgone.
Funding & Lobbying Interests
The sponsor, Rep. Messmer, received $9,200 from energy sector PACs and individuals in the 2024 cycle. Commercial water heating equipment manufacturers and HVAC suppliers typically lobby against stricter efficiency standards, viewing them as costly design and compliance burdens. These manufacturers include both domestic producers (Rheem, A.O. Smith) and foreign competitors (Noritz, Bosch), all of whom have financial incentive to maintain less stringent regulatory requirements.
Political Impact
Affected Groups
Commercial building owners and operators (hospitals, hotels, offices, schools, manufacturing facilities) who manage water heating costs; HVAC and plumbing contractors who install and maintain commercial systems; manufacturing-sector employers who rely on commercial water heating for operations; utility ratepayers whose overall system costs reflect foregone efficiency gains in the commercial sector.
Political Subtext
Proponents argue that strict efficiency standards increase equipment costs, reduce consumer choice, and impose unnecessary regulatory burden on manufacturers during economic uncertainty. They contend the rule was issued without adequate cost-benefit analysis or industry input. Critics counter that the DOE standards follow statutory requirements under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, reflect years of technical analysis, and represent a net economic benefit: while upfront equipment costs rise modestly, long-term energy savings to building owners far exceed compliance costs—a conclusion standard in DOE rulemaking dockets. The Congressional Review Act allows Congress to overturn rules on a simple majority vote, but this mechanism has rarely been used successfully and reversal prevents the DOE from issuing a substantially similar rule without new Congressional authorization.
Real-World Stakes
If this bill passes, commercial water heater efficiency standards revert to pre-2023 levels. Historical precedent: when Congress used the Congressional Review Act to overturn the Obama-era methane emissions rule (2017) and broadband privacy rule (2017), affected industries had short-term compliance cost relief but the broader market trends toward efficiency and consumer preference for lower operating costs continued independently. In the commercial water heating sector specifically, the DOE estimated the 2023 rule would reduce operating costs by approximately $200-400 per unit over the equipment lifetime despite higher purchase prices—meaning building owners would see net savings even without the mandate. Reversal eliminates that consumer benefit and restores manufacturers' ability to sell lower-cost, higher-consumption equipment. No CBO score is required for Congressional Review Act resolutions.
Sponsor
Vote Record
No recorded votes.
Campaign Finance — Primary Sponsor
Top contributing industries
Other$161,968.49
Finance$12,600
Energy$9,200
Healthcare$5,500
Technology$5,320.51
501(c)(4) disclosure: Contributions from 501(c)(4) "dark money" organizations are not required to be publicly disclosed and are not reflected in the figures above. Data sourced from FEC public disclosure filings.
Community Discussion
Share this bill
Sign in to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Be the first.